Minnesota
A 60-day data-practices rule is not statewide removal.
Minn. Stat. § 13.824 — Automated license plate readers · Minnesota HF 4205 (94th) — ALPR unmatched-data destruction amendments · Finding Flock — ALPR laws by state (19 statutes read against official text)
- ALPR statute
- Minn. Stat. § 13.824 (2015 c. 67; 2024 c. 127 art. 3) — data-practices statute, not a collection ban. Collection limited to plate numbers, date/time/location, and pictures of plates/vehicles/surroundings. Unmatched reads destroyed no later than 60 days. Limited warrant to monitor or track a person who is the subject of an active criminal investigation. Biennial independent audit; BCA publishes agency/fixed-location list. Central state repository prohibited unless authorized by law.
- Executive
- Not retrieved. Empty beats a copied neighbor.
- Local
- St. Paul (Aug. 26, 2026): mayor and chief announced removal of two city-owned Flock cameras after a 7–0 nonbinding council resolution; Ramsey County Sheriff cameras inside the city were not removed. Duluth Flock contract expires Sept. 7, 2026; other ALPR continues.
- Funding / grants
- DPS Auto Theft Prevention Program grants have funded some local fixed ALPRs. Grant funding, not a pause.
- Permitting / dirt
- Highway occupancy is a separate instrument from § 13.824 and is not packed here as a ban.
- Privacy
- 60-day data-practices cap, not a collection ban. Ordinary queries rest on written authorization and reasonable suspicion, not a warrant for every search.
Bills and memos
HF 4205 / SF 4739 (94th)
48-hour unmatched destruction; out-of-state warrant; BCA centralization
Lost — House Judiciary failed 7–7 March 17, 2026; sine die May 18, 2026
HF 4661 / SF 4850 (94th)
Third-party platform / nationwide-search amendments to § 13.824
Lost — referred judiciary; sine die May 18, 2026
Comment for this state
A city fight in Minnesota is still one of 19,000. A state ban is one of 50. Sign: https://orwellday.com/stop-flock-solution/